Ludwig
van BEETHOVEN
(1770-1827)
Symphony
No.2 [34:25]
Symphony
No.3 [46:45]
The
Netherlands Symphony Orchestra
Jan
Willem de Vriend conductor
Recorded
at Muzikcentrum Enschede, 18-20 May 2009 and 7-8 September 2010
DDD/DSD Stereo/Surround
Challenge
Classics CC72532
[34:25+46:45]
Buy from:
Astonishing as it may seem, this Beethoven symphony cycle from Jan Willem de Vriend and the Netherlands Symphony Orchestra has a niche in the market almost to itself. With the notable exception of Jos van Immerseel's ongoing cycle, this is the only one available on SACD and played on period instruments. If your dead set on that combination of attributes, it may be worth considering, but otherwise this is very much middle of the road Beethoven with few artistic merits to elevate it above the hundreds of others available.
de
Vriend takes A lively approach to this music, and there is a palpable
sense of energy in every phrase. This is just as well, as his speeds,
at least for period instrument performance, tend to be on the steady
side, with the Scherzo of the Second Symphony in particular weighed
down by surprisingly slow tempo choices. But a more serious failing,
at least to my ears, is the conductor's unwillingness to bring a
distinctive character to each of the individual sections. So the move
from the Adagio introduction to the Allegro exposition in the opening
movement of the Second, for example, has no real contrast and no
sense of surprise. Similarly with the Eroica, a piece that comes with
many interpretive expectations, none of which are seriously
challenged here.
Beethoven's
dynamics, hairpins and accents are faithfully reproduced, in fact
they are often exaggerated, but this is the only way in which the
phrase structure is articulated. So those punch chords from the brass
in the opening movements of both symphonies are driven home, but
there is little nuance or shaping in the quieter phrases that follow.
All
of which is a shame, because the orchestral playing is generally very
good. The Netherlands Symphony Orchestra apparently use modern
instruments for more recent repertoire and period instruments for
Classical-era works. That sounds to me like an improbable scenario,
and I suspect there is a little of both going on here. Certainly, the
calf-skin timpani give a 'period' feel, as do the narrow-bore brass
instruments. But the overall impression is of a big, brash symphony
orchestra with a few period touches added. Given the isolationist
politics that has characterised period instrument performance for
decades, the conciliatory approach of this ensemble may offer a
potential route out of the seemingly intractable division between
ancient and modern. But the orchestra does not find a middle way so
much as mix elements of the two performing traditions without really
offering the best of either.
But
of course, all these impressions come through comparison with the
many other versions of these works on the market, and the recording
could be considered to have merits on its own terms. The Challenge
Classics team go for an atmospheric but clean sound for their SACD
reproduction. The strings and woodwind could do with a little more
definition, but the engineers don't give them the help they need in
this respect.
There
is nothing actually wrong with anything about this recording, and as
I say, the energy and life that de Vriend injects, especially in the
outer movements, makes for engaging listening. But if you listen to
these and then put on the Chailly or Gardiner you'll realise just how
much you're missing.
This review first appeared at MusicWeb International:
http://www.musicweb-international.com/classrev/2012/May12/Beethoven_sys23_CC72532.htm
This review first appeared at MusicWeb International:
http://www.musicweb-international.com/classrev/2012/May12/Beethoven_sys23_CC72532.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment