Max Reger: Organ Works
Volume 12
Suite No.1 in E Minor
Op.16, Suite No.2 in G Minor Op.92
Kirsten Sturm
Sandtner Organ, St
Martin's Cathedral, Rottenburg am Neckar
Naxos 8.572821
This is the sort of music that gives Reger a bad name. If you look at the scores for these two organ suites (they're on IMSLP here and here), you'll find long, rambling movements, seemingly obsessed with Baroque counterpoint, but largely indifferent to the civilising influence of tonality.
Or
that's the stereotype that Reger's detractors would have us read into
this music. These suites, and the first in particular, may live up to
that image on the page, but it is up to the performer to convince us
that they are worth hearing nonetheless. The young German organist
Kirsten Sturm takes a sensible approach to this seemingly thankless
task. She's not in the business of disguising this music, or of
pretending that it is any less megalomanic than it clearly is. Rather
than glossing over the contrapuntal density, she does everything in
her power to draw the ear into the interplay of voices. She is
working on a big organ too, so the result powerful and beguiling, but
always on the heavy side.
The two
suites date from 1895 and 1906, which me could describe as Reger's
early and middle periods. The first was Reger's first published organ
work. The long shadow of Bach hangs over everything here, and the
concluding Passacaglia is a particularly clear homage. Interestingly,
the work is dedicated to Brahms, suggesting a more conscious
historicism to these Baroque stylisations that we usually give Reger
credit for.
The
counterpoint certainly is impressive, but the scale and structure of
the work weighs everything down. On this recording the running time
comes in at 45 minutes, and there are precious few let ups over that
duration in the contrapuntal complexity. The Adagio second movement
is one, and Sturm gives it an elegant performance with the focus
squarely on the melody throughout. She has clearly mastered the
considerable power of her instrument, as is admirably demonstrated by
the gradual increase in weight she affords the textures through this
movement. A little more rhythmic flexibility may have helped the
following Intermezzo come to life, but the concluding Passacaglia is
as free and flowing as anyone could wish for. And just listen to
those pedal trills in the closing pages – an impressive conclusion
by any standards.
The
Second Suite is a superior composition in many respects. At just
under half an hour, its scale is more manageable. Just as
importantly, Reger gives us more chances to catch our breath with a
series of interlude movements between the more demanding fugues.
Generally
speaking, Sturm favours weight and impact over colour and
transparency in her choice of stops for both works. That's certainly
in the spirit of the music, and there is never any sense that the
performer is seeking to correct the composer's mistakes, to lighten
his textures or clarify his counterpoint. The engineering also
favours atmosphere over intimacy. The resulting sound is certainly
imposing and only occasionally overbearing.
Personally,
I'd have liked to hear a little more clarity in the counterpoint,
especially in the huge outer movements of the First Suite. There are
some imprecisions in Sturm's passage work as well, although given the
sheer number of notes she has to contend with, these are surely
forgiveable. But in general this is a traditional reading of Reger.
It's not one that's likely to win the composer any new admirers, but
if you already have a taste for his organ music, there's probably
something for you here.
I suppose when you are unable to make music you can disguise that by writing about it instead.... Gavin indeed
ReplyDelete