Concertos by Gian Carlo Menotti, Theodore Wiprud and
Samual Barber
Ittai Shapira (violin); Russian Philharmonic
Orchestra, Thomas Sanderling (Menotti, Barber); Liverpool Philharmonic, Neil Thompson
(Wiprud)
Champs Hill Records CHRCD043
They are obviously thinking big at Champs Hill Records. The label was only founded three years ago, and with the modest aim of recording some of the performances at the eponymous West Sussex chamber music venue. But now, as this new disc demonstrates, they are recording major orchestral works and adding leading orchestras and soloists to their roster. A risky policy? Possibly in financial terms, but there can be little doubt about the artistic merits of this new album. Three American violin concertos are presented, all performed and recorded to an impressively high standard, and programmed in such a way as to offer the ideal balance of consistency and variety.
That’s not to say, though, that the three works are of
equally high standard or interest. The programme begins with Menotti’s
contribution to the genre, and, to be honest, I think Champs Hill are going to
struggle to persuade British and European audiences that there is anything of
interest in this work. Perhaps I’m just trying to excuse my own views, but the
reception of Menotti’s music has always been much cooler on this side of the
Atlantic. I’ve no objections to the Romanticism of this music, only to the
patronising simplicity of its construction. Menotti bases each movement on a
short motif, which he repeats ad nausem until it feels like time to stop.
Anyway, he no doubt has his fans, who are unlikely to be disappointed by this
performance, which is wonderfully controlled and precise, but also contains
enough passion and commitment to give the work its due, and then some.
Fortunately, the programme takes a turn for the better
in the next work, Theodore Wiprud’s recent Violin Concerto “Katrina”. As I
write this, the Eastern Seaboard of America is being pounded by Hurricane
Sandy, so Wiprud’s concerto about the human cost of the 2005 hurricane in the
Southern States seems all the more apposite. Wiprud plays a dangerous game,
musically speaking, by imposing a narrative on the concerto, while also closely
following the generic conventions of the form. He has the skill to pull it off,
and does so by limiting the explicit references to his subject in the music.
Wiprud writes in his liner note that the soloist becomes a different
protagonist in each of the three movements: in the first a survivor of the
disaster, in the second an observer and in the third a refugee. But as with all
good programme music, you don’t need to know any of this to get the message as
you listen. Wiprud’s two main musical ideas are graphic, often
percussion-driven, depictions of severe weather, and abstract allusions to the
Cajun music of the Deep South. Remarkably, this is the composer’s first ever
concerto for any instrument, but his skill in balancing the competing demands
of soloist, ensemble, programme and genre are impressive indeed. The
orchestration is particularly impressive, and enables Wiprud to steer the storm
music well clear of unintentional comedy. He also prevents the storm from
overwhelming the entire work, which is essential for its ultimate message of hope
and redemption, another aspect that is delicately handled.
Ittai Shapira premiered this concerto, and he gives a
fine performance of it here. The solo part is clearly difficult, but overt
virtuosity would sit uneasily with the work’s subject, and so the performer’s
technical skills are put instead to the service of the whole. The Liverpool
Philharmonic is on fine form. The orchestra was recently heard on another
recording of a recent American violin concerto, that of Jennifer Higdon, and,
then as now, they show an impressive stylistic affinity for the music (although
it should be said that their task is considerably aided by the impressive
orchestration skills of both composers).
Barber’s violin concerto sounds like a breath of fresh
air after the tribulations of the hurricane. Given their close relationship, it
is difficult not to imagine some kind of rivalry between Menotti and Barber
when it came to their violin concertos. To Menotti’s credit, his later concerto
is very different to Barber’s, but the Barber is clearly superior in every
respect.
For the Menotti and Barber, Shapira is joined by the
Russian Philharmonic under Thomas Sanderling (who, for some reason, gets only a
miniscule credit – it would be difficult to imagine his father being treated
like this). I have to confess that I have never heard of the orchestra, but
they put in a fine performance, especially given the alien musical world that
this American music expects to inhabit. That said, a regular diet of Glazunov
and Khachaturian
would probably put you in good stead for performing this sort of music. The
stylistic connections between all these 20th century Romantics were
probably played down during the Cold War, but are becoming increasingly
apparent now. The sound quality on the Russian Philharmonic recordings
(engineered by a Russian team) is excellent, and is slightly superior to that
afforded to the Liverpool Phil, not that I’ve any complaints about the sound
quality there either.
A fascinating disc all round, and
one with something to suit all tastes. The ordering of the programme may look
illogical on paper, but listening to the disc from end to end, it adds up to a
satisfying and surprisingly coherent musical experience.