PRIOR Velesslavitsa
Alexander Prior,
cond; Zhang Xiao Ming (pn); Michael Province (vn); Simone Porter (vn); Nathan
Chan (vc); Northern Sinfonia
TOCCATA 0109 (46:35) Live: Sage, Gateshead 4.26.09
TOCCATA 0109 (46:35) Live: Sage, Gateshead 4.26.09
Considering that Toccata Classics specializes in bringing to light
obscure repertoire, it is little surprise that they are not often involved in
television tie-ins. In fact, the background to this CD sets the whole project
apart from standard Toccata fare. Velesslavitsa
grew out of a series on UK’s Channel 4 called The World’s Greatest Musical Prodigies. If that sounds trite and
sensationalist, then the quality of the music that results will come as a
pleasant surprise. The premise of the series was that the talented young
composer/conductor Alexander Prior would travel the world in search of
similarly talented young performers, for whom he would then write a work. The
group he assembled consisted of two violinists, a pianist, and a cellist, so he
then set to work creating Velesslavitsa,
a concerto grosso that was played by them under his baton and accompanied by
the Northern Sinfonia as the culmination of the final episode.
Listening to the recording, it is easy to forget just how young the
participants were. Prior was 17 at the time, and his soloists ranged from 10 to
15. The music he writes for them isn’t particularly virtuosic, which comes as a
surprise. Instead, he seeks—so he tells us in the liner—to represent their
personalities: Province as sensitive, Porter as precise, Chan as expressive,
and Chan as lyrical.
In terms of composition, Prior has a lot of competing demands to balance
here. These portraits of his four soloists must fit into a single stylistically
unified work, and one that will hopefully find favor with a television
audience. Then there is the orchestra to think about, and he must also use the
opportunity to present his compositional voice to this wide audience.
Astonishingly, he manages to cover all these bases, presenting a work of
considerable artistic merit, whatever criteria it is assessed against. Prior is
half Russian (on his mother’s side) and the work was written shortly after he
had completed undergraduate studies at the St. Petersburg Conservatory, where
he had been the youngest pupil since Prokofiev. Russian music of the Romantic
era is his starting point, and the many Russian dimensions of the work are
clear from the outset. The title is Russian, and refers to the god of music in
ancient Slavic cultures. The concerto is large and sprawling, but retains a
sense of unity through the recurrent use of a Russian Orthodox chant. Prior
takes every opportunity to show off his imaginative use of the orchestra, but
even this is never just for effect. The orchestration continually varies, but
is surprisingly economical, with everything in the ensemble always seeming to
happen for a good reason.
My one criticism, and it’s something common to all prodigy composers, is
the amount of undigested influence that often comes to the surface. The first
orchestral exposition sounds like it has been lifted directly from Boris Godunov, and later on the style
comes dangerously close to Shostakovich. There is also a good deal of Bruckner
and Wagner in the finale. In his efforts to fulfill all the many functions
expected of this work, Prior does go on a bit too long. The Grave central movement would be more
effective if it where half the length, and the coda of the finale seems to go
round in circles for a few minutes, which is all the more frustrating given
that the ending, when it comes, is disconcertingly abrupt.
Both the performance and recording are excellent, and neither suffers
for being taken from a live performance. Prior the composer is often daring in
the ways that he moves unexpectedly between different moods and tempos, but
Prior the conductor is able to demonstrate the innate logic behind each of
these shifts. The sound benefits from the fine acoustic at the new Sage concert
hall in Gateshead, and the woodwind and percussion soloists come across with
particular clarity. A recommended release, then, and one that ought to appeal,
for different reasons, to a number of different classical audiences. The
introduction by Martin Anderson in the liner mentions that the television
program for which the music was written did not include the piece in its
entirety. That seems like a shocking omission, so all credit to Toccata
Classics for giving us the chance to this fine work in all its glory.
This review appears in Fanfare Magazine issue 36:6
This review appears in Fanfare Magazine issue 36:6
No comments:
Post a Comment