Hannu Lintu, cond;
Benjamin Schmid (vn); Finnish RSO
ONDINE 12132 (68:22)
Buy from:
Once upon a time, a recording of Ligeti’s seminal orchestral scores of the 1960s and 70s would have been considered a brave and unusual undertaking. Not any more though, as both the size and quality of the Ligeti discography take the novelty off any new additions. That’s not to say that new releases aren’t welcome though, and successive recordings have shown that different performers can bring new perspectives to these works that predecessors may have overlooked. The Finnish conductor Hannu Lintu provides a fascinating liner note to his new release, in which he rightly points out that, despite the Modernist aesthetic, Ligeti’s music makes interpretive demands on its performers that are more akin to the Romantic repertoire. Not only do the technical issues have to be resolved according to subjective criteria, but expression must be conveyed through the music too.
In fact, Lintu’s reading of these scores equates the music’s meaning
with the technical challenges of its performance much more than his words
suggest. In a later passage of the liner, he discusses Atmosphères and makes the following statement: “What is exceptional
in Atmosphères in the context of
Western music is that the performers are utterly unable to determine what
material is important and what is less important. The whole work seems to
occupy the same level of attention, and no sense of depth is created because
the various elements are all of equal weight.” I’m not sure that’s true, but it
proves to be the credo by which all the works are interpreted. Lintu and the
Ondine engineers studiously avoid any concept of depth that the music might
suggest at either literal or metaphorical levels. So the microphones are placed
close to each section, closing up the sound stage and preventing any sense of
physical perspective across the orchestra. Dynamic levels are kept even, with
the result that lines and textures that other conductors may consider
peripheral are here given elevated prominence to bring them to a state of
equality. The orchestra has clearly been very well rehearsed, and from a
technical point of view this might be the most accurate and proficient reading
of all four works now available. But, as Lintu himself states, just playing the
notes isn’t everything, and interpretation-wise, each of the works struggles
when compared with the best of the competition.
That, in my opinion, is the Ligeti Edition (at least for the purely
orchestral works), which began on Sony, but by the time it had reached these
scores had transferred to Teldec. Jonathan Nott’s recording with the Berlin
Philharmonic (Lontano, Atmosphères,
and San Francisco Polyphony all appear on
Teldec 8573-88261-2) makes full use of the finest technology available at the
time (2002) and of the finest orchestra too. The rich and distinctive BPO sound
benefits every aspect of the music, and the velvety string sound is a
particular asset. The soundstage is deep and involving, allowing the minute
details of the score to appear from different corners of the orchestra, and to
subtly mingle, but without ever blending into undifferentiated blocks.
Lintu’s recording has detail as well, but it is presented in a more
matter-of-fact way by an orchestra with a clearer, less distinct sound, and
engineering that strives for equality of balance at all costs. The results are
more analytical, of benefit to students of Ligeti’s radical orchestration, but
less so to listeners wishing to enjoy the music. The up-front immediacy of the playing
and recording seems ironic in the context of Lontano, a work all about aural, physical, and metaphorical
representations of distance. Even so, this performance is the best thing on the
CD, with the accuracy of the ensemble proving particularly beneficial, and
Lintu (or Ondine?) was right to put it first. Atmosphères feels cold and, well, not very atmospheric, while San Francisco Polyphony generates the
ideal sense of disorientation in the opening passages, but becomes wearing on
the ear in a way that other recordings don’t.
The Violin Concerto is also very well represented on disc. A recent
favorite is the Patricia Kopatchinskaja recording with Peter Eötvös (Naïve V
5285, reviewed 36:4), in which the Eastern European folk roots of the music are
brought to the fore in a lively and utterly distinctive reading. Benjamin
Schmid is at the other end of the scale, and like Lintu, he provides a
documentary account, avoiding needless idiosyncrasy. Technically, his is a
proficient reading (which is saying something), but it just feels too reserved.
The one exception is the Aria second movement, in which he brings a rich and
attractive viola-like tone to the low-register melodic lines. Lintu again
brings out every detail of the orchestration, revealing all sorts of curious
anomalies and clashes (the orchestral strings are tuned to a range of competing
standards and temperaments). This is occasionally to the soloist’s detriment
though, especially as the engineers give the orchestra much more prominence
over him than either the score suggests or his projection allows him to compete
against.
Pursuit of detail is clearly what has motivated Hannu Lintu in this
project, so it is a shame that the disc was not released in SACD. When it was
independent, the Finnish Ondine label issued many of their releases in SACD,
but after it was bought by Naxos this came to an end, in line with the latter
company’s aversion to the medium. While all these works have been recorded many
times before, neither they, nor, I think, any of Ligeti’s works has yet appeared
on any high resolution format (apart from one recording of the Horn Trio on
BIS). Given the levels of complexity and detail in these scores, that seems like
a missed opportunity. In a high-resolution format, this recording may have had
something unique to offer, especially given the attention those details have
clearly received from conductor, players, and engineers alike. As it is, the
recording sits somewhere near the top in a competitive field, but all of these
works are available elsewhere in more convincing and more engaging readings.
This review appears in Fanfare Magazine issue 37:4.
This review appears in Fanfare Magazine issue 37:4.
No comments:
Post a Comment