Alexander RASKATOV (b. 1953)
Monk’s
Music
(2005)
Gordon
Jones (bass)
Carducci
String Quartet
Rec.
March 2013, Wathern Abbey, London
Louth
Contemporary Music Society LCMS 1302 [54:06]
Alexander Raskatov is difficult to pin down. His music draws on many of the stylistic trends of the late Soviet Russia of his youth. Schnittke’s polystylism is often apparent, especially in A Dog’s Heart, the controversial opera for which he is best known in the UK. Other works tend more towards the religious minimalism of Arvo Pärt, but, unlike Pärt, his music is always grounded, with a strong sense of rhythmic focus and drive.
Monk’s
Music
is religious and minimalist too, at least in its structuring, which is
sectional and with each part based on repeated phrases and note sequences. But
it is far from mood music. Much of the writing here is surprisingly aggressive,
loud and with biting attacks from each of the players of the string quartet. In
fact, the expressive range is very wide, and there are also many quiet contemplative
passages. But each section sets a mood and sticks with it. Ideas are not
developed, so much as presented as indivisible units that run their course
before the next begins. Yet, despite this rigour, the music is rarely austere.
Sentiments from Russian Orthodox texts suggest the world of chant, and although
none is quoted directly, the disciplined solemnity and fervent devotion of
Orthodox ritual in continually evoked.
The
work is structured as seven adagio movements for string quartet, each prefaced
with a short unaccompanied recitative from the bass singer. The texts are by
Starets Silouan, a 19th-century Orthodox elder, each running to just
one or two sentences. Comparisons to Haydn are of limited use here. Clearly,
the Last Seven Words was an influence, but Raskatov seeks a different
kind of devotional music, less contemplative, more engaged.
The
musical language of Orthodox Chant is also suggested by the modal nature of the
music, although it rarely employs homophonic or chordal textures that might
suggest a choir. Instead, we often hear a single melodic line repeated over a
deep pedal, or textures built in very direct ways from a clearly audible note
pattern. Hard accents and regular repetition often the combine to give the
music an emphatically rhythmic feel.
The
performances are excellent throughout. Bass Gordon Jones is clearly not from
the Orthodox tradition, allowing him to engage with its performing culture, but
from the outside, a relationship with Orthodox liturgy that reflects that of
the work itself. His voice is deep and powerful, but there is great sensitivity
to his singing, with carefully shaped phrases, and a range of dynamic nuance.
The Carducci Quartet, who premiered the work, perform with accuracy and
conviction. Raskatov writes unusual textures for the quartet, but they are
always idiomatic. Even so, the players are often expected to create expansive
soundscapes from minimal material, the sheer body of their sound giving the
music its weight. Those heavy attacks are also executed effectively, and
without ever compromising the evenness of the tone. The recording information
suggests that the singer and quartet were recorded separately, but the ambience
afforded to both, warm but not overly resonant, sounds very similar, given the
impression of a single, unified performance.
Monk’s
Music
very nearly disappeared without trace. It was written, in 2005, for Valentin
Berlinsky of the Borodin Quartet. But Berlinsky left the quartet before they
had a chance to perform it, and so it lay languishing in a drawer. In 2013,
Eamonn Quinn of the Louth Contemporary Music Society approached Raskatov with
the idea to perform some of his music in Ireland, and this was the work that
was chosen. (Presumably it was at this point that the disappointingly prosaic title
was chosen.) Quinn has certainly promoted the music well; the work has now had
two public performances and has been released on this excellent commercial
recording. And, as the recording demonstrates, the work itself is fully
deserving of the commitment, time and resources he has put into it. It is a
forthright and uncompromising work, but is highly recommended, especially to
those with an interest in the more unusual directions that the Orthodox faith
has taken new music in the years since the fall of the Soviet Union.
Thanks for this. Yes, not only is it a 'disappointingly prosaic title', but it also risks confusion with the great jazz composer. :-)
ReplyDelete