Schnittke Anniversary Edition Melodiya
SCHNITTKE Dedication to Igor Stravinsky, Sergei
Prokofiev, and Dmitri Shostakovich. Piano Quintet. Violin Sonata No. 2. Concerto for Piano and
Strings. Concerto Grosso No. 4/Symphony No. 5. Violin Concerto No. 4
Gennady Rozhdestvensky (pn), cond; Dmitri Kitayenko, cond;
Viktoria Postnikova, Alexander Bakhchiev, Vladimir Skanavi, Eliso Virsaladze
(pn); Liana Isakadze, Gidon Kremer (vn); Borodin Qrt; Moscow PSO; SO of the
USSR Ministry of Culture; SO of the Moscow Conservatory
MELODIYA 10 02630 (2 CDs: 145:09)
Buy from:
This two-disc album presents broadcast recordings of Schnittke’s music
from concerts at the Moscow Conservatory between 1977 and 1990. Most of the
works were very recent at the time of recording, and although there are no
premiere performances here, several of the players are dedicatees of the music
they perform.
The conductor Gennady Rozhdestvensky is a looming presence throughout
all of this music, though he was only directly involved in the composition of
the first piece, the piano six-hand work Dedication to Igor Stravinsky,
Sergei Prokofiev and Dmitri Shostakovich (1979). This 1980 recording
features the same three players who gave the premiere the previous year, Rozhdestvensky
(in a rare outing as pianist), his wife, Viktoria Postnikova, pianist Alexander
Bakhchiev. The 1979 concert for which Rozhdestvensky commissioned the work was
devoted to four-hand and six-hand works for a single piano, and also featured music
by Czerny, Grainger, Smetana, and Moscheles. Schnittke emphasizes the sense of
humor of his three dedicatees, taking quotations from Shostakovich’s ballet The
Golden Age, Stravinsky’s opera The Nightingale, and Prokofiev’s Humorous
Scherzo for four bassoons. The composers are also represented by monograms,
and the material is carefully layered among the parts. It is a light-hearted
program opener—though the quotations are obscure—and is played well here.
The Second Violin Sonata (1968) marked a turning point in Schnittke’s
music, away from the serial techniques he had employed in the early 60s and
towards the polystylism for which he is best remembered today. Emphatic G-Minor
chords punctuate the piano part, as if to reclaim the sonority, but there is
still no functional tonal harmony. A motif based on the B-A-C-H monogram also
appears, harmonized with unrelated diatonic harmonies. The work was written for
Mark Lubotsky, who premiered it in 1969. This performance, by Liana Isakadze,
dates from 1977. Melodiya also released a recording of Isakadze performing the
work in 1978 (S 10-10831-2), but that was presumably a studio version, although
it was with the same pianist., Vladimir Skanavi. Their playing here is
propulsive and vigorous. Isakadze is less aggressive than some in this music,
but she is able to maintain the sense of unpredictability, with each of the new
ideas and transformations presented as a fresh and original idea.
The Piano Quintet (1972–76) was written in response to the death of
Schnittke’s mother. It introduced an elegiac character into his music that
continued for a decade. Ghostly waltzes and ethereal chorales add a
polystylistic dimension, but everything is somber and reflective, avoiding the
extreme stylistic contrasts of the sonata. The work is well-represented on
disc, but this performance, from 1984, is a revelation. It is given by the
Borodin Quartet and pianist Eliso Virsaladze. Although these players did not
give the work’s premiere, the piece was originally written for the Borodin
Quartet, and the fourth movement opens with a chord derived from each of the
player’s initials. In this performance, they capture the contemplative mood
perfectly, but, like Isakadze, they maintain a focussed narrative quality
throughout. Virsaladze is able to blend the piano into the string sound, or at
least project a feeling of unity within the ensemble, without any sense that
the strings and piano are in competition.
The Concerto for Piano and Strings (1979) extends the religious imagery
that Schnittke had been experimenting with in the Piano Quintet, and most of
the music is made up of allusions to Orthodox chant and to Russian bell
ringing. The work is harmonically dense, as both the chorales and the bells are
usually presented through bitonal harmonies, cleverly voiced to give the
impression of clear triads projecting though the dissonance. That sort of
religious imagery pervades the work, but only comes through if the pianist has
a feel for those unexpected moments of clarity. Vladimir Krainev gives a
compelling account, with just the right mix of mystical contemplation and
fervid aggression. The concerto was written for Krainev, and this recording,
from February 1980 was made just two months after he had given the premiere in
Leningrad. Unfortunately, the strings of the Moscow Philharmonic don’t match
his precision, and Schnittke’s (admittedly complex) textures are often muddied
by poor ensemble. This work is also well represented on disc. Top choice is the
version with Viktoria Postnikova and Gennady Rozhdestvensky, conducting the
London Sinfonietta (Erato 45742). But also consider the brand-new recording
from Denis Matsuev with Kammerorchester Wien-Berlin under Rainer Honeck (DG 4838489,
see review this issue), an expansive and highly Romantic account, a little
lacking in bite, but rich in expression and with excellent ensemble.
The second disc opens with an address from Rozhdestvensky to the Moscow
audience, ahead of the performance of the Concerto Grosso No. 4/Symphony No. 5.
He speaks in Russian, but an English translation is included in the booklet. He
seems to be concerned that the audience will struggle with the work’s double
affiliation, but his explanation is clear and succinct. The first movement is
the Concerto Grosso, for violin, oboe, and harpsichord soloists and in the
Bach-focused neo-Baroque style that Schnittke had developed in his earlier
grossi. It then develops into a Mahlerian symphony, by way of an arrangement of
a piano quartet fragment that Mahler wrote as a 16-year-old. The work was
written for the Royal Concertgebouw, a commission to celebrate the orchestra’s
centenary in 1988. Rozhdestvensky’s performance is the Moscow premiere, given
in 1990. The Concertgebouw had recorded the work, with Riccardo Chailly, in
1989 (Decca 430698), and that remains the benchmark. Chailly is more fluid in
the Mahlerian music—Rozhdestvensky more frenetic. The Concertgebouw playing is
far superior to the Symphony Orchestra of the USSR Ministry of Culture, heard
here, but the latter does sound satisfyingly Russian, with narrow woodwinds and
blaring brass.
The Fourth Violin Concerto (1984) was written for Gidon Kremer, who
plays it here, and a monogram based on his name is one of the main motifs. The
work is a companion piece to the more famous Viola Concerto, and in both,
Schnittke experiments with the effect of corrosive banality, as a deliberate
expressive tool. So the music regularly drifts into light dance rhythms or
other incongruous allusions, like the Big Ben chimes with which it opens. A
serious undercurrent balances these effects, and the “real” music that
Schnittke writes here is similar to the quasi-Mahler in the Fifth Symphony,
lyrical but freely atonal and dissonant. Kremer also recorded the work with the
Philharmonia and Christoph Eschenbach in 1996. That was part of a variable
complete set of Schnittke’s violin concertos (Warner 3984-26866-2), but
fortunately it was the most convincing of the four recordings. Superior playing
by the Philharmonia seals the deal—Kremer is consistently fine across the two
accounts—though Rozhdestvensky is more laid back here than in the symphony, and
is in perfect sympathy with Kremer’s approach.
Sound quality is reasonable to good. The first disc is noticeably older
than the second in terms of recording standards, but both have a dry sound that
suggests overly zealous remastering. The packaging is lavish, with the release
described as an “Anniversary Edition,” marking Schnittke’s 85th birthday, which
fell in 2019. The recordings have obvious historical significance, but they are
also fine performances in their own right. The range of repertoire is also
impressive, and even though the Piano Quintet is the only top-choice recording,
the album should also serve to introduce new audiences to Schnittke’s music.
This review appears in Fanfare magazine issue 44:1.
Much obliged for sharing this brilliant substance. its extremely fascinating. Numerous websites I see these days don't actually give whatever pulls in others however the manner in which you have plainly clarified everything it's truly awesome. There are loads of posts But your method of Writing is so Good and Knowledgeable. continue to post such helpful data and view my site too...
ReplyDeletepaper airplane designs for distance and speed | how to make a boomerang airplane | how to make a paper airplane eagle | best paper airplane design for distance and accuracy | paper airplane that flies far and straight | dihedral vs anhedral | science behind paper airplanes | classic dart paper airplane | zazoom internet | nakamura paper airplane